Second, we explicitly focus on ethnic groups living outside their “home” region. The present study fills the existing gap in these previous studies and the starting point of this article lies in the following two points: First, we do not take the existing analytical categories of marginalisation-clan/individual experiences of social segregation and exclusion from engagement in the social life of their community. The geographic focus is in the southwestern part of Ethiopia. Common to all studies are occupational groups and clan-based marginalisation. Above all, the demarcations in the study area are revised. The study points to the need to address the repressive structures that lead to the structural marginalisation of people. They experience an institutional marginalisation that limits their social and political opportunities. We found Oromos in areas severely marginalised by dominant political narratives that have attempted to promote homogeneous ethno-states. The data used combined interviews, focus group discussions, observations, audiovisual archives, and documentary reviews. In this article, we shed light on the marginalisation currently faced by the Oromo people living in areas stretching on the regional Amhara side of the border with the Oromiya region. Drawing borders does not conform to ethno-territoriality, leaving some outside their home regions. Since Ethiopia adopted a multinational federation in 1991, Amhara and Oromiya have evolved into nationalist regional states that serve the political interests of the ethnic Amhara and Oromo, respectively.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |